It's not often I speak specifically of things at work. But today, there's just one thing I have to say. I heard testimony in committee this afternoon from a licensed Minnesota attorney, and it just boggled my mind. He was there to discuss blighted housing, what to do about it, how can we get rid of it, using non-profits to help get rid of it, etc. Keep in mind that we changed our eminent domain laws last year to tighten things up since
Kelo and you supposedly aren't just willy nilly able to go take someone's property just 'cause you feel like it and it's good for economic development (and for you locals, just think Best Buy all over again).
This gentleman, who shall remain nameless, apparently believes that there is only one kind of due process: procedural. He kept saying that if notice was given, there was no issue of due process because he was unaware of any other kind of due process. I'm sorry, but did you skip the day in law school when they discussed
substantive due process? That's the part that you might want to think about, since there's the little subject of
taking your property - I don't care if it is by the government or a private entity acting at the direction of a court. Seems to me that's a pretty big deal.
Where do these people come from? And they're not only licensed to practice law, but they're called before a MN Senate committee because they supposedly have some knowledge of their subject area? This was supposed to be this guy's area of expertise since he practices in it!
There. I just had to get that off my chest. I could go on and on - the committee I sat through today really irked me for many reasons - but I will stop now.